Point 2 - "Light before Sun in bible". Can this be counted as an Error?

Point No.2 - Bible says in Genesis Ch. No. 1 Verses No. 3 and 5,…‘Light was created on the first day.’ Genesis, Ch., 1 Verses, 14 to 19… ‘The cause of light - stars and the sun, etc. was created on the fourth day’.  How can the cause of light be created on the 4^th day - later than the light which came into existence on the first day? - It is unscientific.

Reply:

Query is a 'Neanderthal' man's doubt. No offense. "Cause of light - stars & sun .. so bible- It is unscientific" (Will get claps from brainless).

1) Source of light are not only sun and stars, where ever a friction occurs you can see sparks, i.e also light. Lighting is another common example. Is lighting is from Sun? Lightning : massive electrostatic discharge between electrically charged regions within clouds, or between a cloud. 
 How ever you heard of fission & fusion which produce enormous amount of energy, along with light. There are different forms of light sources are there, such as celestial and atmospheric light,terrestrial, direct chemical, Radioluminescenc, Piezoluminescence, laser lights, electron stimulated (Our electric lights) and so on.
There for light is wave form, electromagnetic radiations which is visible to human eye. There are also variations in electromagnetic radiations which are not visible (eg infrared wave, to see use a cam and remote). Before claiming "It is unscientific!" please have a little knowledge in science.

2) 'Photon Decoupling' phenomenon which produces light in relations with big bang theory, the light is already there before the creation of sun and stars.

3) Many versus in bible says Jesus is the light eg:John 8:12, Matthew 5:14 etc. In Revelations 21:23 states "And the city has no need of sun or moon to shine on it, for the glory of God gives it light, and its lamp is the Lamb. " 

There for claiming source of light is only sun and stars are just unscientific and false according to bible.

Lets look in to Quran about lights.

1) Sura 71:15-16, states:

 "..and made the moon a light (noor) in their midst, and made the sun as a lamp (siraaj)?"

                      moon = noor (noor is Reflection as says by Naaik)

                      sun = siraaj (siraaj is Lamp as says by Naaik)

Naaik states, these two are light while 'noor' of moon is reflection of light, thus scientific book of human kind is only quran. So to get full scientific knowledge read quran.

There for what about these versus about allah in quran. 

For example see Sura 24:35

[Transliteration] "Allahu nooru assamawatiwal-ardi mathalu noorihi kamishkatin feehamisbahun almisbahu fee zujajatinazzujajatu kaannaha kawkabun durriyyunyooqadu min shajaratin mubarakatin zaytoonatin lasharqiyyatin wala gharbiyyatin yakadu zaytuhayudee-o walaw lam tamsas-hu narun noorun AAalanoorin yahdee Allahu linoorihi man yashao wayadribuAllahu al-amthala linnasi wallahubikulli shay-in AAaleem"

[Translation] "Allah is the Light(noor) of the heavens and the earth. The example of His light(noor) is like a niche within which is a lamp(misbahu), the lamp(misbahu) is within glass, the glass as if it were a pearly [white] star lit from [the oil of] a blessed olive tree, neither of the east nor of the west, whose oil would almost glow even if untouched by fire. Light(noor) upon light(noor). Allah guides to His light whom He wills. And Allah presents examples for the people, and Allah is Knowing of all things."

From this versus you can see allah = noor (not misbahu , reflection or shadow)

So if Claims quran is scientific then the 'allah' is just a reflection. Is that so moon was taken care in Islam in such importance (moon worshipers)? Quran never says whose reflection is allah, but naaik have to say that.

2) Sun setting in muddy spring! Straight and forward no more diversion or word injecting as says by musalem scholars. quran 18:86 "Until, when he reached the setting of the sun, he found it setting in a spring of dark mud, and he found near it a people."
This is not scientific (As says by scientific naaik) and this was once the human concept of sun set and sun rise.

If there a word 'as if' is added in between the lines, this error can be corrected. But some versions of quran still not updated, but some of them were updated with those kind of editions. Moslems will talk about the word of Allah is unique. Then once book was injected with this type of words and covering the mistakes in quran, recompile this. After wards how can it be claimed as unchanged word of allah? This is perfect example to say state that quran is got corrupted.
eg For word insertion, if naaik says "Mr.X, my father." The people who compile his words later add [as if], then "Mr.X,[as if] my father." Is this correct or not? only adds in braces, Let them explain the words of naaik!

So while continue to say errors regarding quran, it will need to write a book which will be having volume more than quran.





Earth created after day?